Under Bad Press Walmart Drops Claim Against Disabled Former Employee

Ed Normand
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 336
Posted by Ed NormandApril 04, 2008 9:55 AM
Tags: None

Debbie Shank was an employee of Wal-Mart who was in a trucking accident and  sustained horrific permanent brain injury including most of her ability to even communicate and walk.  Her medical bills were paid for by her health insurance with her employer, Wal-Mart.  Of course, she worked for the right to have these health benefits.  After the accident  she and her family sued and recovered around $417,000 (after fees and expenses). The net settlement funds were put into a trust to help pay for her future medical care. 

Sadly, after Wal-Mart got wind of the settlement, instead of offering to help more because the net proceeds were far from sufficient to cover her future care needs, Wal-Mart's health benefit plan  chose to sue Mrs. Shank to take the settlement proceeds from her.  Walmart won the suit because the language in its health benefit plan says that it can take everything from a settlement up to the full amount of the settlement.  So it did. The Shank's appealed. They lost. Apparently, Wal-Mart did not care that this family lost everything, even a son who died in the Iraq war, and that Ms. Shank would have nothing to help her in the future.

 Then finally the word got out about what Wal-Mart was doing to this family. The story appeared all over the internet, in the mainstream news and elsewhere.  Most people were astounded that large companies can take away all of the settlement proceeds from an auto accident or other injury.  Most people do not know that these employers can do this even though the employee worked hard to earn the health benefits.  It was not welfare.

According to an interview with Jim Shank, after all the bad publicity, Wal-Mart decided to do the right thing.  Wal-Mart claims it will not take all the recovery from Ms. Shank and will amend its benefit plan to "allow us more discretion for individual cases".  Hopefully Wal-Mart and other will recognize that it is not fair to treat employees this way. After all, the employee worked for the health benefits, it was not given for free. Further the employee is the person hurt, the employee has to hire the lawyer, do all the work to win in court, take all the risk including financial liability if they lose in court, and so it is not fair that the employer can sit back and just take all the money dollar for dollar once the employee wins the case.  For years and years the fair way for health insurers to operate and a way  that many State Laws require (but not employment health plans which are immune from State law) is that the health insurer can get paid back a fair percentage. By example, if the injury is worth one million dollars but the net recovery is only 10% of that then the health plan should only get paid back 10% of its medical bills.  That is more fair and hopefully what Wal-Mart will make as its policy.  

8 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Darren
Posted by Darren
April 04, 2008 6:43 PM

Gee this sounds like a one sided story.

Darren
Posted by Darren
April 04, 2008 6:47 PM

Just learned do not hit enter. Any way, where is her responsibility? Does she not have the responsibility to pay back the insurance company? This was not a health claim, this was an accident claim. Most insurance companies (work, home, auto) if something happens they will pay everything upfront, to make sure that it is covered, and then if you get a settlement you are to pay them back. What is happening here is she got Walmart to pay her medical bills and then she got to collect from the other part for the same thing. She got the money twice.

Annie
Posted by Annie
April 05, 2008 7:08 PM

No, Darren. You need to read the entire story. This woman is permanently disabled and brain-damaged. The money Wal-Mart was seeking is money awarded for FUTURE medical expenses. If Wal-Mart wants to sue someone, it should be the attorneys who took their 1/3 from this woman.More ...

Gene
Posted by Gene
April 05, 2008 9:56 PM

The people who lost are the ones with insurance that will now pay higher premiums. Wal-Mart nor their insurance companies are going to lose a penny. Also, the woman is on Medicaid so all tax payers are footing the bills.

Derelda
Posted by Derelda
April 13, 2008 12:29 AM

The bottom line to this whole story: It is immoral that Walmart sued this family for her trust fund, whether it was legal or not. Hopefully this will make other companies take a look at their own healthcare policies and amend them. In today's world this type of action by large companies will only make the already strained healthcare system even worse. Consumers do have a say, and thankfully Walmart listened. Another fine example of consumer power was against Target. When they would not let the Salvation Army bell ringers stand in front of their stores a few years ago, the consumers reacted, and the next year Target donated millions of dollars to the Salvation Army

Derelda
Posted by Derelda
April 13, 2008 12:42 AM

To Continue: even though they still would not allow the bell ringers in front of their stores. I'm willing to bet Target lost more in revenue than they donated. If more people would stand up for injustice on many issues, we could take back our dignity and rights. I now will reconsider telling Walmart (Corporate) that I would no longer shop with them. I still don't shop at Target! God Bless freedom of speech! I am thankful to be an American!

KB
Posted by KB
May 01, 2008 1:12 PM

My only question to this is this:

KB
Posted by KB
May 01, 2008 1:15 PM

My only question is this: Is it Walmarts responsibility to pay for the long term care of Mrs. Shank ? If WalMart is paying for her care from time of accident until time of death, then the $417,000 is theirs under the rules of subrogation from what I understand. However if WalMart is only paying for 1 year, then the $470,000 should go to any care after that one year. Now we sit here and cry about WalMart, but what about their atorney who took $530,000 in trial fees? Where is his compassion, and why did WalMart fail to protect their own interests by not suing the trucking company theirselves?

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Orlando

InjuryBoard Orlando RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Orlando is brought to you by Wooten, Kimbrough, Gibson, Doherty and Normand, P.A.

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Wooten, Kimbrough, Gibson, Doherty and Normand, P.A. (866) 735-1102 Ext 336 www.whkpa.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Orlando, Casselberry, Clermont, Daytona Beach, Debary, Deltona, Kissimmee, Mount Dora, Sanford, Seminole County, St. Cloud, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Apopka
236 South Lucerne Circle East, At Delaney, Orlando, Florida 32801 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address